Library / First Principles Framework (FPF) - Core Conceptual Specification
Jump to passage
In this reading

Link to current text

Published source confirmed at last check

Source changed 2026-10-03 08:25:59 UTC · snapshot created 2026-10-03 10:17:34 UTC · last check 2026-10-03 10:20:08 UTC

C.16.Q:2 - Problem

How can FPF let working texts keep the communicative convenience of the word quality while preventing category errors when the term crosses:

  • phenomenological and epistemological discourse,
  • architecture-description fitness discourse and viewpoint-fit discourse,
  • representation-learning and neuro-symbolic discourse,
  • Popper- and Deutsch-style explanation-and-criticism discourse,
  • engineering architecture and quality-characteristic discourse,
  • open-ended evolution, NQD, and selection discourse,
  • control, world-model, and active-inference discourse,
  • ecological affordance discourse, including source-tradition affordance cases that must leave quality-term restoration for A.6.A for wording recovery, then the pattern for the recovered claim or question?