C.16.Q:2 - Problem
How can FPF let working texts keep the communicative convenience of the word quality while preventing category errors when the term crosses:
- phenomenological and epistemological discourse,
- architecture-description fitness discourse and viewpoint-fit discourse,
- representation-learning and neuro-symbolic discourse,
- Popper- and Deutsch-style explanation-and-criticism discourse,
- engineering architecture and quality-characteristic discourse,
- open-ended evolution, NQD, and selection discourse,
- control, world-model, and active-inference discourse,
- ecological affordance discourse, including source-tradition
affordancecases that must leave quality-term restoration forA.6.Afor wording recovery, then the pattern for the recovered claim or question?