Library / First Principles Framework (FPF) - Core Conceptual Specification
Jump to passage
In this reading

Link to current text

Published source confirmed at last check

Source changed 2026-10-03 10:39:28 UTC · snapshot created 2026-10-03 10:40:04 UTC · last check 2026-10-03 11:20:03 UTC

C.16.Q:3 - Forces

  • Breadth vs precision. “Quality” is attractive because it is broad; that same breadth makes it unsafe at boundaries.
  • Preconceptuality vs auditability. Some uses refer to something real but not yet stably characterised.
  • Distributed substrate vs local publication. Some evaluative signals arise in distributed or embodied substrates but must later be published in explicit local forms.
  • Comparability vs non-reduction. Engineering and selection settings need comparability, but not every evaluative signal is an admissible metric.
  • Cross-tradition dialogue vs false unification. The framework should permit parallels without asserting identity.
  • Progressive articulation. A term may begin as a felt signal and later become a bundle, proxy set, or objective.