Library / First Principles Framework (FPF) - Core Conceptual Specification
Jump to passage
In this reading

Link to current text

Published source confirmed at last check

Source changed 2026-10-03 10:39:28 UTC · snapshot created 2026-10-03 10:40:04 UTC · last check 2026-10-03 11:15:11 UTC

C.2.P:4.5 - Rewrite execution modes

C.2.P:4.5.1 - Direct repair

Use this mode for the ordinary case. Rewrite the sentence and state one plain reason or non-use boundary. No row or note is required.

Example result: “The note helps the reader find section 4.2.” Reason: this is navigation, not evidence or assurance. Stop.

C.2.P:4.5.2 - Compact row

Use the five-field row in 4.0a when the recovered distinction must remain inspectable. Add only the optional fact that changes the current claim.

C.2.P:4.5.3 - Full check

Use a full check only when:

  • several unresolved fields interact;
  • the source-to-FPF use is contested; or
  • a reusable ontological or naming decision is being made.

The full check records the exact span and function, competing readings, selected kinds and relations, direct pattern contributions, rejected overreads, final wording, remaining reader use, and reopen condition. It is not required because the text is an FPF pattern or because a source is cited.

C.2.P:4.5.4 - Publishing the compact row as a local note

When the five-field compact row must remain beside the repaired text, publish that same row as a local note. This changes only its presentation: it adds no fourth execution mode, no extra required field, and no durable FPF record kind.