C.26:11.1 - Selected operational source anchors

The following anchors support the pattern’s operational modeling moves.

Claim	Source family	Practical implication
Mathematical formalisms can be transferred as modeling lenses without claiming the target domain is made of the source-domain stuff.	Wigner on mathematical usefulness, Jaynes on probability as logic, and Khrennikov’s quantum-like modeling line.	Treat QL as a math-lens transfer: name the useful structure, the ordinary FPF pattern, and the local stop before any claim requiring additional evidence or authority.
Quantum-like open-system and instrument formalisms can model state and probe interaction without physical quantum ontology.	Basieva, Khrennikov, and Ozawa and arXiv, plus Khrennikov on open systems.	Keep `QL-NQ` central and use QL only where probe, instrument, open-information-system update rule, probe frame, export admissibility, or state export cue changes the admissible reading.
Question order, contextual judgment, and instrument-like operations are practical cues, but not automatic proof that QL is necessary.	Quantum instruments for question-order effects, Quantum Cognition, and process-theory non-exclusivity.	Use QL-lite when order/frame/probe effects change the result; keep classical instrument, Bayesian, causal, and ordinary measurement rivals live.
Same-content-looking measurements under different probe or measurement frames should not be silently treated as the same random variable or as jointly distributed.	Contextuality-by-Default.	Use C.26 only when the exact frames change variable identity, joint availability, or admissible comparison and a named obstruction survives ordinary measurement and Bridge patterns; otherwise keep those ordinary subject patterns.
Viability and active sensing often mix reading and acting, but ordinary control and measurement patterns remain primary.	Free-energy and quantum-cognition link, physiological regulation and FEP, active inference behavior, and smart-building active inference.	For viability cases, name sensors, probes, actuators, and envelope variables first; retain QL only for remaining probe, frame, export, or coarsening cue.
Boundary and DDD-locality questions are already disciplined by ordinary architecture practice.	Computational boundary of a self, Markov blankets of life, Azure domain analysis, and DDD 2025 SLR.	Apply direct boundary, local-sense, work, model-use, interface, and Bridge subject patterns first. If Markov-blanket wording is present, recover its exact claim and subject pattern; retain C.26 only where a named probe, order, comparison, export, or state-reading obstruction remains load-bearing.
Low-bit, tokenized, compressed, geometric, or neural representations may be useful shortcuts without being QL activation.	1-bit LLMs, implicit continuity in language models, emergent quantumness in neural networks, and covariant gradient descent.	Keep implementation substrate, geometry, compression, and representation shortcuts in ordinary FPF patterns unless a declared QL cue changes the admissible use.
Unknown alternatives and regime movement are search/generation problems, not QL claim authority.	Open-endedness and quality-diversity through AI feedback.	Use QL only to mark a suspect frame; apply search or regime patterns to generation of alternatives.