C.26:8.2 - AI and LLM work-cycle route examples
LLM-mediated work cycles often create the same representational mistakes C.26 repairs: false passive read, false faithful summary, false shared comparison frame, and shortcut without loss/use declaration.
| AI case | Route |
|---|---|
| LLM summary of an architecture record | A.6.3.CSC, A.6.3.RT, and A.10 first; C.26 coarsening only if a state-representation shortcut is being overused. |
| Prompted model evaluation changes model or prompt behavior | C.16 / B.3 first; C.26.1 only if the eval output is treated as a passive model-state read. |
| Agent work cycle “discovers” requirements | A.15 / A.10 / A.6 first; C.26.1 only if the interaction created the requirement framing. |
| Synthetic personas “represent market state” | A.10 / B.3 first; C.26.2 only if a low-recoverability state-reading claim is carefully bounded with non-admissible use visible. |