Library / First Principles Framework (FPF) - Core Conceptual Specification
Jump to passage
In this reading

Link to current text

Published source confirmed at last check

Source changed 2026-10-03 02:22:15 UTC · snapshot created 2026-10-03 03:38:22 UTC · last check 2026-10-03 04:25:17 UTC

C.28:2 - Problem

Three kinds of collapse can produce causal overclaim:

  1. Rung collapse: observation, intervention, and counterfactual comparison are treated as the same question.
  2. Support collapse: data regime, identification, estimation, direct sampling, and simulation are treated as one alternative-valued “basis”.
  3. Authority collapse: an evidential conclusion is treated as publication, choice, deployment, fairness, or assurance authority.

C.28 keeps those distinctions visible while allowing a cheap stop.