C.3.3:10 - Anti‑patterns & Remedies (informative)

Anti‑pattern	Why it’s wrong	Remedy
One interoperability score, or mandatory scope-plus-kind bridges	Blurs independent channels and invents unused relations	Open only the exact Scope, kind, and sense relations consumed by the receiving use; keep their losses and R consequences separate
Claiming preserved `⊑` while inverting order	Makes typed reasoning unsound	Mark as not preserved; add loss note; consider adapter or subkind redesign
Hiding collapses	Overstates coverage	List collapsed subkinds explicitly; plan the justified R penalty for lost granularity
Implicit latest mapping	Non-deterministic and non-auditable	Pin both scheme editions and the mapping-rule edition in the bridge assertion; outside bridge definedness decline that bridge use without changing an independently obtained receiving result.
Using KindBridge to widen G	Conflates kind correspondence with claim-scope translation	Keep Scope edits in USM (ΔG±); KindBridge never widens Scope
Adjusting F/G for poor `CL^k`	Violates F–G–R & USM separation	Route consequences to R only; consider narrowing Scope or adding adapters