C.3.3:11 - Conformance Checklist
| ID | Requirement |
|---|---|
| KB-01 | A locality or scheme change first triggers kind-definition comparison. A bridge has exact ordered, independently identified distinct kind participants and an obtaining directional correspondence predicate. |
| KB-02 | A KindBridge maps neither Scope nor sense; A.2.6 and F.9 are added only when their own exact use is current. |
| KB-03 | Participants, distinctness, direction, predicate, applicability, definedness, and participant-determined identity are recoverable. Scheme/signature/assertion/card/publication editions qualify interpretation or reliance but do not reidentify the occurrence. |
| KB-04 | Receiving classification checks admissibility before a fresh three-valued judgment. Source truth is never copied; bridge refusal does not rewrite the receiving result. |
| KB-05 | An order-preservation assertion names exact source and target subkind facts and the two bridge relations used. |
| KB-06 | Inversion is non-preservation with loss; unsettled order remains unknown. |
| KB-07 | Collapse designates affected source order facts and lost distinctions without rewriting either kind order. |
| KB-08 | CL^k is an assessment in the bridge assertion and does not alter kind identity, formality, scope, or abstraction facet. |
| KB-09 | Reliance applies only justified CL^k consequences to R; admissibility, F, G, and classification truth stay unchanged. |
| KB-10 | Chained bridge reliance uses the weakest link while keeping occurrences and assertions distinct. |
| KB-11 | Loss notes state non-preserved criteria or subkind facts and do not change either kind. |
| KB-12 | Definedness is explicit; outside it the guard declines that bridge use while independent receiving classification keeps its own result. |
Integration requirements with Part B. Part B distinguishes the C.3.3 kind-correspondence channel from scope and F.9 sense channels, routes justified CL^k consequences to R, and retains weakest-link chaining. Templates designate exact relied-on relations and assertions; their fields create none of them.