CB.6:11 - SoTA-Echoing
| Source line or developed treatment | Contribution used | Adaptation and limit |
|---|---|---|
| Spinks, The Business of Belonging (2021), physical PDF 119–129 | Return the experienced value of contribution and consider different forms of acknowledgement, status, connection, access and benefits. | Treat these as options. Claims that payment always displaces care, that every community needs status growth or that a peer reward system prevents gaming are too broad for choosing the response. |
| Self-Determination Theory, especially CET and OIT | Distinguish interest in an activity, instrumental motivation, internalisation and the perceived autonomy or control of social responses. | These distinctions guide questions about the arrangement; they do not predict one person’s reaction to a particular award without evidence. |
| CB.5 and OCE.12:4.3 | Return a contribution’s actual result and conduct a task-focused conversation about what helped and what needs changing. | Appreciation has its own purpose; technical acceptance, developmental feedback and an organisational decision retain their criteria. |
Compared with an unexamined prize or leaderboard, this construction requires more attention to the contribution and recipient but can reveal misleading attribution, unsuitable terms or an absent provider. The simpler alternative is often a specific acknowledgement.
Source returns: Spinks; the official SDT account, including CET and OIT. Reconsider the response when the contribution, its receiving effect, the person’s preferences or the promised opportunity changes.