fpf.tools
Library / Community Building Principles Framework
Jump to passage
In this reading
Source · lines 1685–1698

Link to current text

Published source confirmed at last check

Source changed 2026-10-03 11:52:20 UTC · snapshot created 2026-10-03 11:53:41 UTC · last check 2026-10-03 13:05:11 UTC

CB.7:7 - Conformance Checklist

For an ordinary next contribution, ask:

  • What useful result will participants receive, and which organising work is missing?
  • Why is the proposed person suitable and willing, and what preparation remains?
  • Are their authority, access, time and help actually sufficient for the next occasion?
  • Which choices are local, and where does an unresolved exception go?
  • What did a performed episode reveal about value, burden and needed support?
  • If a temporary participant group is used, can it confer, act within its scope and return a useful response before its assignment ends?
  • If continuation matters, can the next person perform the work, or has the promise been reduced honestly?

A stronger claim about professional competence, influence or cultural continuation requires evidence appropriate to that claim. The ordinary result here is the obtained organising contribution and its supported next use.