CGOV.12:2 - Problem
A controlling shareholder can obtain approval for a transaction while omitting a notice or consent owed to another class. A minority holder can discover the omission only after an exercise deadline or irreversible commitment. A right that existed on paper then fails to protect the choice it was intended to preserve.
The holder can also misread the position: losing a vote is treated as proof of abuse, dilution as necessarily unlawful, or a wish to leave as an obligation on the company to buy. These inferences can direct effort toward an unavailable remedy while a real, time-limited right expires.