Library / Computational Thinking DPF
Jump to passage
In this reading

Link to current text

Published source confirmed at last check

Source changed 2026-10-03 14:36:52 UTC · snapshot created 2026-10-03 14:38:14 UTC · last check 2026-10-03 15:15:10 UTC

CMP.9:4.4 - Choose sample effort and a compatible stopping rule

Select the error statement that changes the receiving decision. For independent identically distributed contributions bounded in [a,b], Hoeffding’s bound gives

P(|mean Y_i-μ|≥e)≤2*exp(-2*n*e²/(b-a)²)

at a fixed n chosen independently of their observed values. Thus n≥(b-a)²*log(2/δ)/(2*e²) suffices for error at most e with failure probability at most δ. The range and independence assumptions belong to this particular bound.

If results are inspected to choose the stopping time, use a compatible sequential bound. A simple conservative construction assigns δ_n=δ/(n*(n+1)) and applies a fixed-n bound at each n with that failure budget. Since the budgets sum to δ, all resulting intervals cover simultaneously with probability at least 1-δ. Stop when the current interval settles the question. More efficient confidence-sequence methods can replace this construction under their stated hypotheses.

Generating more draws is one possible improvement. A better proposal, stratification, fewer redundant transitions or an affordable deterministic calculation can improve the answer more per unit work. Include the cost of drawing, evaluating, weighting and retaining the results. Use C.11.DUA when deciding whether further computation is worthwhile; exploratory sampling need not acquire a formal interval unless the intended claim needs one.