D.3:5.1 - Bias-Annotation

Bias risk	Failure	Mitigation
Debate replaces a connected account	The team argues about values before connecting each claim to an affected entity, scope, frame, consequence, and horizon.	Write the side rows and tension statement before mediation.
Description becomes conflict	A diagram, matrix, or narrative is treated as the ethical conflict itself.	Identify the description as a C.2.1 episteme and keep its EntityOfConcern and presentation form separate.
Collection name becomes responsibility	Organization, society, public, market, or AI is treated as responsible by label.	Recover systemhood, membership, participation, assignment, and agency evidence separately; cite the exact responsibility relation or missing governor.
Formal completeness displaces use	A large record is filled even though two sides and one tension already answer the current question.	Stop at the first adequate description and add only detail consumed by the next use.
Architecture absorbs ethics	Cross-scope residual wording hides value, harm, responsibility, or admissible sacrifice.	Use the applicable architecture pattern for the residual and use D.3 with D.4 for the ethical conflict and its use.