| CC-D3-1 | A reusable result is one C.2.1 episteme with one exact EntityOfConcern, ClaimGraph, and effective ReferenceScheme. Edition, form, carrier, and publication remain separate. | Makes the reference used by D.4 reidentifiable. |
| CC-D3-2 | At least two sides each connect one ethical claim, affected entity, declared level relation or applicable scope, value-frame edition, consequence, and horizon. Evidence use and uncertainty are added when current. | Shows what each claim affects rather than presenting a flat inventory. |
| CC-D3-3 | Any ClaimScope on the whole description remains separate from side-specific ClaimScopes and Work extents. | Prevents the description’s coverage from replacing the scope of a side. |
| CC-D3-4 | The tension names the sides and states why they cannot all be met as stated. Any direct relation claim cites its definition and obtaining occurrence, or the exact A.6.RCD missing-governor result. | Prevents a reference field from manufacturing a fact in the situation. |
| CC-D3-5 | Classification assertion, Method, Work, relation definition, relation occurrence, evidence episteme, evidence use, publication, form, and carrier remain separately typed when used. | Prevents the conflict description from absorbing neighboring objects. |
| CC-D3-6 | The first useful result is readable without the optional enriched branches, and every added branch changes the conflict or its next use. | Keeps D.3 affordable in ordinary project work. |
| CC-D3-7 | The next-use statement names D.4, D.5, C.28, C.30.ILC, evidence, assurance, or another receiving pattern by value. | Keeps mapping separate from mediation, decision, proof, and assurance. |