fpf.tools
Library / Development Opportunity Construction and Development-Direction Advising Principles Framework
Jump to passage
In this reading
Source · lines 701–717

Link to current text

Published source confirmed at last check

Source changed 2026-10-03 11:52:20 UTC · snapshot created 2026-10-03 11:53:41 UTC · last check 2026-10-03 12:20:10 UTC

DOCA.1.CHR:7 - Conformance Checklist

A conforming characterization or companion account:

  1. MUST identify the subject and configuration, receiving use, horizon, scenarios, and evidence window.
  2. MUST select each characteristic by an explicit way it can change the current inquiry or a protected condition.
  3. MUST state the bearer, meaning, Scale or levels, Unit when applicable, polarity, and time stance for every relied-on characteristic.
  4. MUST distinguish current, intended or exploratory, protected, and unknown readings.
  5. MUST keep result, resource, affected-System or distributional, and explicitly protected coordinate families visible when finite comparison is current.
  6. MUST NOT force incomparable coordinates into one scalar or assert Pareto improvement without a complete oriented set under one basis.
  7. MUST identify the direct owner, source, qualification, and uncertainty for every decision-reversing reading.
  8. MUST NOT use a MethodDescription, dashboard, benchmark, source link, or tool output as proof that measurement Work or a result exists.
  9. MUST return each missing premise as a bounded request, unknown, narrower claim, blocker, or stop.
  10. MUST retain a next measurement, comparison, pattern, direct-owner use, or local reopen condition only where it changes the recipient’s continuation or interpretation. A sufficient direct characterization creates no further-work or omission-record obligation.
  11. MUST NOT present the characterization as a chosen direction, recommendation, programme, authorization, performed Work, or observed effect.
  12. SHOULD make the first useful result readable without requiring the compact form.