DOCA.8:5.2 - A corrected source can change use even when the world did not change

In a constructed case, a human-development report’s corrected edition states that a performance result concerned supported review, not independent review. The person’s actual performance history has not changed. The correction changes which claims the report can support.

The known opportunity account used the independent-performance premise to qualify a later step. That step now lacks its transfer basis; the supported-performance result can remain useful within its proper conditions. A new course is not inferred from the correction.

Several other possible receivers are not fully known. Under A.10.1, the responsible practitioner bounds discovery to the current development inquiry’s opportunity notes and issued advice, excluding unrelated historical projects. Source-oriented search finds the cited report; receiver-oriented inspection also finds an uncited independent-performance assumption.

One note merely lists the report as background. Another uses its corrected claim in a path. A private recipient-held copy cannot be inspected. The outcomes differ: the background mention supplies no affected use; the path needs its HCD and DOCA qualification; the private copy remains a named coverage gap, not an unaffected result.

The direct DOCA return can finish with the locally blocked path, supported-review result and unresolved recipient-copy question. Subject qualification is still required before asserting a restored independent-performance claim. If an adviser needs a common overview, it cites these supported results and groups the irrelevant background mentions; no separate exclusion note is needed. Neither return claims complete no-impact coverage.