fpf.tools
Library / First Principles Framework (FPF) - Core Conceptual Specification
Jump to passage
In this reading
Source · lines 88593–88602

Link to current text

Published source confirmed at last check

Source changed 2026-10-03 08:25:59 UTC · snapshot created 2026-10-03 08:26:43 UTC · last check 2026-10-03 08:50:20 UTC

E.10.DEV:4.3 - Coordination with trajectory wording

The phrase development trajectory does not require two full repairs by spelling alone.

  • Start with E.10.DEV when the action-changing doubt is which subject is developing, what remains identifiable, or whether improvement is asserted. If that repair also makes the path wording harmless, stop.
  • Continue to E.10.MOVE only when the trajectory itself still carries a separate claim about position space, order, segment identity, actual, predicted, or planned posture, or representation.
  • Start with E.10.MOVE when the bearer and development claim are already clear and only the path or trajectory posture is unresolved. Invoke E.10.DEV afterward only if a distinct development or evolution ambiguity remains.

Both routes must converge on the same direct subject claim or exact gap. Neither child creates a DevelopmentTrajectory kind, and no recovery note is required for a clear local sentence.