fpf.tools
Library / First Principles Framework (FPF) - Core Conceptual Specification
Jump to passage
In this reading
Source · lines 88605–88614

Link to current text

Published source confirmed at last check

Source changed 2026-10-03 11:52:20 UTC · snapshot created 2026-10-03 11:53:41 UTC · last check 2026-10-03 12:20:10 UTC

E.10.DEV:5.1 - Different objects of development

Constructed wording for repair: Our development programme improves the product, develops Mira as an engineer, and advances our research.

Return a missing-information result to the programme author. First ask whether the sentence describes proposed work or work already performed and, separately, whether each effect is intended or observed. Then ask:

  • Product: Which product and characteristic should or did change? What comparison makes that change an improvement, under which conditions?
  • Mira: Which engineering Work family and conditions does the capability claim concern? For an observed increase, obtain the comparable qualification results through :5.2 before retaining that claim.
  • Research: Which claim or problem formulation is meant? What revision is proposed or observed, and under what criterion does it count as an advance?