E.17.AUD.OOTD:5.1 - Architecture note shifting into rollout work
A short architecture memo begins with:
This note is about the proposed service boundary between catalog and checkout.
Three paragraphs later it says:
We should therefore assign rollout responsibility to platform and stage migration in two sprints.
The fix is not only lexical.
The memo’s primary subject began as the service boundary, but its carried move changed from describing or assessing that boundary to proposing responsibility assignment and a two-sprint rollout; its apparent downstream use changed from understanding to planning and decision. None of those changes by itself proves that the C.2.1 EntityOfConcern of an exact carried episteme changed.
Repair the memo in one of two ways:
- keep the note about the boundary and push rollout outside;
- or make the changed move and downstream use explicit and use a downstream decision or rollout publication.
Repaired two-sentence memo. This memo assesses the proposed service boundary between catalog and checkout. Rollout sequencing, responsibility assignment, and approval remain outside this memo.
Action saved. The author publishes those two sentences and stops: no six-row artifact, empty transition declaration, neighboring-pattern reference, assurance record, or evidence package is produced. A rollout record opens only if rollout later becomes current work.