fpf.tools
Library / First Principles Framework (FPF) - Core Conceptual Specification
Jump to passage
In this reading
Source · lines 95350–95362

Link to current text

Published source confirmed at last check

Source changed 2026-10-03 05:29:54 UTC · snapshot created 2026-10-03 05:30:57 UTC · last check 2026-10-03 07:00:10 UTC

E.17.EFP:4.2.a - Working-model first

Ordinary published forms do not restate every field or replay the ontic decision. When their exact claim-bearing episteme, MVPK face, any material E.24.PUB occurrence, and already published source references make the branch recoverable, the compact note inherits those conditions by reference.

A source-bearing review record becomes necessary when:

  • explanation class differs across faces in the same publication bundle;
  • the rendering relies on bounded connective prose that is not obvious from the source wording alone;
  • didactic or speculative wording creates a real risk of policy, assurance, or gate misuse;
  • source linkage, provenance, or reliability transport would otherwise become unclear;
  • the rendering is a fork, adaptation, translation, generated explanation, tutorial, access-format conversion, or another derivative publication that can be mistaken for the source publication, source relation, or source episteme itself.

When one rendering needs its own narrower bounded claim or effect line, blocked downstream claim or effect line, or source-bearing reopen rule because distinctions were deliberately coarsened for reader fit, the issue is no longer only explanation class. Do not keep that case here as if it were merely one more helpful rendering style; apply A.6.3.CSC Controlled Semantic Coarsening.