E.17.EFP:4.2.b - What a publication-side reviewer checks first
A publication-side reviewer starts with five questions:
- Which exact source edition is intended: what ClaimGraph, EntityOfConcern and effective ReferenceScheme identify it?
- Does the text express enough for the declared use, retaining action-changing qualifications, source return and use-relevant omission disclosure? Whole-source coverage is not required; an omitted answer-changing condition blocks this use even if the displayed sentences are true.
- Does the text assert changed content or concern another entity or effective scheme? If so, which exact target and independently obtaining source-to-target relation support its form?
- Which E.24.PUB form or applicable A.6.3.RT representation expresses the identified episteme, and which explanation class changes the reader’s next action?
- Has the form begun carrying another unsupported claim, relation, reliance or deliberately coarsened use that must return to its direct pattern?
If a prerequisite is missing, return the exact source-identity, source-sufficiency, target-identity or relation gap. Do not manufacture a target from an omission or repair a gap with a class. Once these prerequisites and the action-changing class distinction are recoverable, the compact note is complete. Open a fuller face-by-face record only when a section 4.2 trigger consumes additional fields.