E.17.ID.CR:4.1.c - Why the comparative-review-unit specialization needs its own discipline

Teams already produce small comparative review units, often as comparison notes, comparison sheets, or guided review aids, that add more interpretive lift than a short F.9.1 stance note about an existing bounded-use claim but still stop below action selection, ontology reframing, retargeting, or approval guidance. Leaving that middle band unnamed creates two opposite failures: one reader dismisses the review unit as harmless prose, while another over-reads it as if it already carried substitution, action-selection pressure, or action authority.

This pattern gives teams a narrow way to prepare, share, and inspect that comparative review unit without smuggling a downstream claim or effect beyond what the source, bridge stance, and bounded use can honestly carry.