fpf.tools
Library / First Principles Framework (FPF) - Core Conceptual Specification
Jump to passage
In this reading
Source · lines 95818–95838

Link to current text

Published source confirmed at last check

Source changed 2026-10-03 05:29:54 UTC · snapshot created 2026-10-03 05:30:57 UTC · last check 2026-10-03 07:20:10 UTC

E.17.ID.CR:4.1.d - Local working vocabulary

This pattern uses a small local vocabulary for review.

  • Comparative review unit = a lightweight review unit such as a short comparison note, small comparison sheet, guided review aid, or guided comparative UI whose explicit job is one bounded comparison or a small set of bounded contrast rows under one shared review frame.
  • Base governing case = the primary source relation, pattern-governing case, or project work question that already governs the review use before bounded comparison is added.
  • Reviewed source episteme or source publication = the already pinned or otherwise reviewable source episteme or source publication being comparatively read; in plain terms, the already available source episteme or source publication under review.
  • Source references = sourceAnchorSet or sourceRefs that make the interpreted source episteme or source publication inspectable.
  • Shared review frame = the review target, described situation, decision situation, release candidate, method family, control scope, problem frame, or source-set reference that remains preserved while the comparison is made.
  • Compared alternative = one distinct option, method, bulletin, strategy, note, view, source episteme, source publication, or project-side FPF kind and reference named by value kept separate under the shared review frame.
  • Same EntityOfConcernRef case = the special case where the compared sources describe the same entity. This is common, but it is not required when distinct alternatives remain under one shared review frame.
  • Interpretive lift = the bounded comparative or asymmetry-bearing comparison added on top of already available source epistemes or source publications; in a small comparison sheet, each row has its own declared comparison criterion while the unit keeps one shared blocked downstream claim or effect and boundary trigger.
  • Bridge references = required bridgeOccurrenceRef and boundedUseClaimRef when the case depends on bridge-mediated correspondence rather than ordinary source interpretation alone. The use-claim reference resolves a claim whose EntityOfConcern is that Bridge occurrence and whose proposed use, direction, correspondence rule, tolerated loss, and polarity match this comparative unit. Optional bridgeCardRef cites reusable packaging, and optional bridgeStanceRef cites a separate F.9.1 episteme whose EntityOfConcern is that exact use claim.
  • Bounded comparative use = what this review unit can be used for while it remains only a bounded comparative review unit.
  • Overread risk = how the review unit is most likely to be overread into a bridge, action-selection, ontology, or authority claim that it does not carry.
  • Prompt boundary = the explicit U.AbductivePrompt publication that becomes the governing publication when an abductive-prompt or action-selection claim governs the next action.
  • Ordinary minimum block = the smallest ordinary record that keeps the review unit honest for working use.
  • Load-bearing extension = the fuller declaration record used when the case sits close to bridge, explanation, abductive, ontology, or authority boundaries.

These terms are local review fields for completing the comparative review unit. They keep source references, shared review frame, compared alternatives, bounded lift, blocked downstream claim or effect, and boundary trigger readable in the card. When one of those fields starts carrying a bridge, evidence, gate, speech-act, commitment, work, authority, publication-face, or project-side FPF claim, name that crossed claim and use the governing pattern for it.