E.17.ID.CR:6 - Bias-Annotation

Scope: bounded comparative review units governed under ComparativeReviewUnit inside InterpretationDiscipline, not all review, all publication, or all decision work.

This pattern intentionally biases toward one modest object: a bounded comparison over already available source epistemes or source publications. Its mitigation is positive before it is prohibitive: recover the source references, shared review frame, bounded lift, blocked downstream claim or effect, and boundary trigger. When the boundary trigger fires, name the crossed claim and use the governing pattern for that claim rather than extending this pattern by another warning list.

The governance risk is not that a comparative review unit exists; it is that fluent comparison hides stronger use. The pattern therefore keeps reader-fit, interaction mode, and source relation visible only when they change the review unit’s actual use, while keeping authority-bearing claims with their own governing patterns and project-side FPF kinds and references named by value.