E.2.DA:4.5 - Evidence and coordinate separation
One evidence locus may support several coordinates, but the rationale must say what property it supports in each coordinate. The following distinctions carry most repairs:
| Distinction | Use |
|---|---|
P1 vs P2 | smallest decisive structure vs reader comprehension and first move. |
P2 vs P6 | usable recognition text vs recoverable register mapping. |
P5 vs P7 | placement of the content that defines, constrains, or tests the claim vs useful change in action. |
P7 vs P11 | practical payoff vs current source contribution. |
P8 vs P9 | cross-scale invariant vs state, transition, edition, and currentness. |
P10 vs E.23 | evolvability of the FPF object vs repeated improvement method. |
If a distinction cannot be recovered from the FPF object, lower the affected coordinate and state the first repair. Do not add a new local doctrine table to explain around the missing content.
E.21 and E.9.DA results are evidence loci for E.2.DA, not inputs to be averaged. A pattern-quality value can support a Pillar only by pointing to the evaluated pattern’s beneficial or harmful FPF-level effect.