A.19, A.19.ECS, A.17, A.18, C.16, and C.16.Q | Govern the characteristic space, object-specific evaluation specification, characteristics, scale/value bindings, measurement boundary, coordinate-result quality ascriptions, and precision of those ascriptions. E.21 supplies the pattern-quality coordinates, calibration, non-arithmetic PatternQualityQBundle result payload named by C.16.Q, aggregate result shape, and local status meanings. |
E.8.ECSPF | Guides an author in carrying an accepted evaluation characteristic-space specification into practitioner-facing FPF pattern content. It keeps the specification, its CharacteristicSpace, the authored pattern, a later evaluation, and its result distinct. |
F.19 | Governs whole-span precise-language reading, repair, and local revalidation. E.21 consumes its compact quality effect through PrecisionRestorationProfile and lowers the affected existing coordinates. E.10 supplies cues and unresolved word or kind routes. |
E.8 | Governs authoring of the pattern body whose exact edition E.21 assessment work evaluates and owns the canonical SoTA definition and positive comparison contract. E.21 consumes one completed E.8:11 comparison when it assigns SoTABindingAndCurrentness = 4 or 5; it does not redefine that contract. |
A.13, A.15.1, A.3.1, F.6, A.2, and A.2.1 | Define or constrain the item 5 dated-assessment-Work account. A.13 supplies every precise evaluator-performer’s core and same obtaining assignment; A.15.1 independently admits the Work from its performance history, temporal extent, enacted Method, and obtaining containing-System relation under the exact boundary and qualification window; F.6 adds only a current precise assignment-bound attribution. A compact account may omit an unused identifier only when every consumed relation remains recoverable. The Work, any returned value or direct evaluation-result relation, and the C.2.1 result episteme stay distinct. An E.21 claim connects them only through an exact A.6.1 result binding or a separately declared direct evaluation-result relation that actually obtains. An evaluator may ordinarily apply the questions without asserting dated Work. Route unresolved source role through E.10.ROLE. |
A.6.1 | Constrains only the exact declared-operation application admitted under the compact conditional rule in E.21:4. |
C.2.1 | Governs the constitution of the checked pattern episteme/version reference, per-coordinate result claims, aggregate pattern-quality-result episteme, and optional evaluation-record episteme independently. |
A.10 and B.3 | A.10 governs evidence use/provenance and bounded reliance on the result; B.3 governs an actual named assurance claim about it. Witness presence and a favorable value create neither relation. |
F.10 and G.11 | Govern downstream status use/interpretation and currentness. The local PatternQualityStatus value neither admits a pattern nor authorizes downstream use by itself. |
E.24.PUB and C.29 | E.24.PUB governs publication occurrence/form/carrier; C.29 governs any mathematical-lens use in representing a result or record; the coordinate claims and their justification remain in the E.21 result. |
E.19 | Declares admission and refresh review profiles and result boundaries. Dated E.19 review work may request or consume a current E.21 result, but its review work, findings/result, and authority-bearing admission or refresh decision remain separate from E.21 assessment work and coordinate results. |
E.22 | Frames purpose, floor, trade-offs, and proposal expectation before an evaluation. |
E.23 | Governs repeated improvement and repair work using the existing E.21 values and stop meanings for pattern versions. |
E.13 | Governs pragmatic utility and proxy-to-value alignment when quality values, visible measures, review results, all-5 result framing, or release cues are used as practical value, target, incentive, gate, or improvement proof. |
E.9.DA | Declares the DRR decision-adequacy characteristic space and result rules. Dated E.9.DA assessment work evaluates one exact upstream DRR episteme when pattern-quality defects trace to decisions; its checked object, work, and result are not E.21 objects. |
F.18, E.10, A.6.P, C.2.P, C.16.P, and C.16.Q | Govern naming and wording-use precision when quality defects are lexical or ontological. |
A.20, A.21, and A.15 | A.20 governs internal-constraint validity for its stated transformation-flow subjects and cases; A.21 governs gate decisions; A.15 governs system-role–Method–Work alignment. Authority claims retain their separate direct relations. An E.21 result may be cited only through the exact receiving relation and supplies none of these by itself. |
E.11 | Governs entry-distribution and expanded entry-disambiguation cues; E.21 supplies only the scoped quality result. |