Library / First Principles Framework (FPF) - Core Conceptual Specification
Jump to passage
In this reading

Link to current text

Published source confirmed at last check

Source changed 2026-10-03 14:36:52 UTC · snapshot created 2026-10-03 14:38:14 UTC · last check 2026-10-03 15:05:10 UTC

E.22:12 - Relations

PatternRelation
E.21Supplies pattern-quality values and the complete pattern-quality coordinate set.
E.9.DASupplies DRR decision-adequacy values and the complete decision-adequacy coordinate set.
E.2.DASupplies FPF Pillar-adequacy values.
E.19Supplies admission or refresh review profiles when that is the evaluation.
E.23Governs repeated improvement after framed evaluations return findings or proposal rows.
E.13Governs pragmatic utility and proxy-to-value alignment when framed values, visible measures, proposal counts, or all-5 posture are being used as the intended improvement value.
A.19, A.19.ECS, A.19.CPM, A.2.6Govern the selected CharacteristicSpace, its construction description, predicate/comparator semantics and actual comparison application, and exact U.ClaimScope; E.22 binds their values for one question but does not redefine them.
A.13, A.15.1, A.2, A.2.1, F.6, A.6.1, C.2.1Define or constrain the exact evaluator, independently admitted evaluation Work, optional local classification and precise assignment-bound attribution, any operation application and result binding, and any durable result episteme. Assignment and F.6 refs are included only when the record or receiving use expressly represents attribution. The direct evaluation pattern defines its typed result relation; E.22 mints no generic evaluation-result or Work-result relation. An ordinary frame may stop at an intended evaluator or planned condition without asserting actual Work.
A.2.4, A.10, G.11Govern actual evidence use, provenance, and currentness separately from the expected evidence-basis description.
C.22.PFRGoverns an actual Problem occurrence when the consuming use relies on one; evaluation need, finding, or floor failure alone establishes none.
E.10, E.10.ROLE, A.6.P, C.2.P, F.18Repair load-bearing wording and names introduced by frames or findings. E.10.ROLE resolves an ambiguous source role before E.22 cites a local system-role kind, assignment occurrence, relation participant, or ordinary non-system meaning.
C.16, A.17, A.18, C.25Govern characteristics, scales, measurements, and quality bundles.
C.17, C.18, C.19, G.5, G.9Govern OEE and NQD candidate, archive and front, pool, selected-set, and parity claims; G.11 governs currentness.
C.11, C.24, A.15, A.20, A.21, A.10, B.3When a quality result is reused beyond evaluation, C.11 governs choice among an available OptionSet; C.24 governs call planning after the action or option is fixed; A.15 governs system-role–Method–Work alignment; A.20 governs internal-constraint validity for its stated transformation-flow subjects and cases; A.21 governs gate decisions; A.10 governs evidence use, provenance, and bounded reliance; B.3 governs an actual named assurance claim. A release claim needs the pattern that defines that claim.