A.19.ECS | Constructs or repairs an object-under-improvement evaluation when none exists. |
E.22 | Frames each quality evaluation through suffixless QualityEvaluationQuestionFrame and QualityEvaluationUseDeclaration epistemes and can return finding or proposal rows. |
E.21 | Supplies pattern-quality values for pattern-improvement loops. |
E.9.DA | Supplies DRR decision-adequacy values for DRR loops. |
E.2.DA | Supplies FPF Pillar-adequacy values for corpus-level loops. |
A.22.CGUS | Defines the current improvement unfolding structure predicate: exact constituents, already-obtaining relations, guards, admissible alternatives, selected continuation, stop, and subject-assertion reconsideration conditions. The structure, visible cycle, record, and slice perform no Work. |
A.13, A.15.1, A.2, A.2.1, F.6, A.6.1, C.2.1, A.3.4, A.15.PROD | Define or constrain exact actual performers, independently admitted evaluation or improvement Work, optional local classification and precise assignment-bound attribution, application and result binding, result episteme, actual Transformation, and any separately current production branch. E.23 mints no generic Work-result or Work-to-change relation. |
C.22.PFR | Governs an actual Problem occurrence when one is used by an improvement claim; a finding, floor miss, evaluation need, or loop record does not establish its actuality or temporal identity. |
E.13 | Governs pragmatic utility and proxy-to-value alignment when loop targets, quality values, metrics, or review results become substitutes for the intended value. |
G.2 | Governs source-use and source-pack return before DPF seeds based on source-use records, admitted source publications, agent-practice claims, or source-composed improvement claims can be used as evidence. |
F.18 | Supplies durable-name evaluation for naming loops. |
C.25, C.16.Q | Govern engineering quality bundles and quality-word precision repair. |
C.19.1 | Governs BLP and cost and risk comparison for method-family choice. |
C.22.1, C.24 | Govern durable task-family adaptation and tool-call planning when the loop makes those claims. |
C.17, C.18, C.19, G.5, G.9, G.11 | Govern OEE and NQD candidate characteristics, archive, front, pool, selected set, parity, and refresh. |
E.18, E.18.3 | When the exact selected A.22 improvement structure also satisfies transformation-flow membership and boundary conditions, recognize that same U.Structure as the current transformation-flow unfolding structure. A visible loop, method, record, or series of Work occurrences supplies neither membership nor a second TFS by shape. |
E.18.1 | Carries accepted problem-side records or generated seed records toward the next FPF relation, including DPF seed-to-hardening routes before a quality-improvement loop is ready. |
E.4.DPF | Governs DPF authoring routes and publication carriers when a fast local framework seed is the object being carried toward use or admission. |
E.4.PFAD, E.4.PFR | Govern framework architecture decisions and framework relation records; E.23 may improve a declared artifact version but does not decide those framework slots. |
A.21 | Governs gate-decision publication; monitoring, retry, escalation, or a green harness state does not publish gate passage unless an OperationalGate(profile) gate-decision relation is present. |
C.32.P2S | Uses improvement-loop results only when they reopen architecture problem-to-structure carry-through; E.23 still governs the loop record and re-evaluation. |
C.11, A.10, B.3, A.15, A.20, A.21 | Govern decision, evidence, assurance, work, gate, and release claims when a loop result is reused beyond quality improvement. |
E.10, E.10.ROLE, A.3.1, A.3.2, A.6.P, C.2.P, F.18, F.19 | Repair load-bearing wording and names introduced by loop records. E.10.ROLE resolves ambiguous source role before any system-role-kind, assignment, participant, or non-system use is asserted. A.3.1 supplies the Method admission test; A.3.2 supplies the membership test for a qualifying U.MethodDescription. Selected pattern content otherwise defines, constrains, tests, or guides without becoming the Method or its description. |
E.23.CAE | Supplies the separate observation-and-disposition probe when apparent capability loss or failed transfer leaves the object to improve ambiguous. It returns candidate routes, not an improvement-object choice or loop decision. |
E.23.CDI | Describes the separate Method for developing one admitted holder System’s capability for a named Work family and checking transfer in representative Work after development is separately selected. E.23 routes to it but does not absorb its action sequence; member distributions and cultural propagation keep their own results. |