Library / First Principles Framework (FPF) - Core Conceptual Specification
Jump to passage
In this reading

Link to current text

Published source confirmed at last check

Source changed 2026-10-03 08:25:59 UTC · snapshot created 2026-10-03 08:26:43 UTC · last check 2026-10-03 09:00:05 UTC

E.4.DPF:4.1 - Select the current first result

Select the result whose condition is true now:

  1. Cheap route or stop. Existing FPF or source material closes the immediate use and no later author or reviewer needs a settled edition, dependency, initial pattern-placement or relation, or publication/access boundary. Use the route or stop without E.4.PFAD or an E.9 DRR.
  2. Framework-architecture answer. A choice among the five outcomes in steps 8–9 must settle a later-used boundary. Use the E.4.PFAD profile and record the selected answer, including relations among initial patterns that change the architecture, in one E.9 DRR. PFAD supplies no separate result or relation.
  3. Organization-design proposal. Candidate organization claims need their own review before an architecture answer is selected. Use the C.2.1 proposal episteme locally called FrameworkOrganizationDesignProposal. The proposal is optional and is not a prerequisite for the architecture question.
  4. Architecture-description use. The framework entity, architecture relation, and selected structures already exist, and the immediate question is how an architecture description may be used. Use C.30.AD; its ArchitectureDescriptionUseCard@Project name is retrieval-only. When project locality depends on a composite project U.Work, identify that Work under A.15.6, recover every precise performer’s A.13 core, and use A.15.1 for independent Work admission. Add F.6 only when precise assignment-bound attribution is also current. Keep the description-use relation separate.
  5. Authoring-dependency description. A named next authoring use needs a stable account of dependency availability and relevance. Use the C.2.1 episteme locally called FrameworkAuthoringDependencyDescription. It may cite the accepted answer and its E.9 DRR when that basis matters, but it is neither a prerequisite nor an automatic result of the architecture answer.

The condition, predicate, and receiving use of each result determine when it exists. The five results are alternatives rather than stages.