E.4.DPF:4.2 - Make the intended result reviewable when a separate organization proposal is needed

First make the design target present. IntendedFrameworkResultDescription is an ordinary local use name for one exact current C.2.1 U.Episteme, not a root kind or card kind. C.2.1 identifies it by:

<exact intended-result ClaimGraph,
 current DPF-authoring U.WorkPlan as EntityOfConcern,
 effective U.ReferenceScheme>

The current A.15.2 WorkPlan declares coordination claims for possible future DPF-authoring Work, the intended framework-result kind, and its acceptance target. It is present now; a dated authoring Work occurrence and the framework result may remain future. The intended-result ClaimGraph states the domain or local use frame, readers, first uses, purpose, declared relation-family coverage constraints, intended-result constraints, and acceptance conditions. The effective U.ReferenceScheme interprets those claims. One exact A.2.6 ClaimScope separately bounds which claims and uses are current; changing scope does not substitute for changing the C.2.1 identity triple.

Keep use qualification and empirical grounding in their defined neighboring relations. If interpretation for the receiving use genuinely depends on an independently selected BoundedModelUseStructure, cite that A.1.1 and A.22 structure as an optional neighboring use qualification; effective ReferenceScheme and ClaimScope retain their own positions in the account. If empirical grounding is current, state a separate C.2.1 EpistemeEmpiricalGroundingRelation to one A.1-admitted holon and the covered claim subgraph. The grounding relation, its evidence, the WorkPlan, any separately claimed dated authoring Work, any separately claimed composite project Work, and the description episteme remain distinct. Each precise performer has an A.13 core; Work claims use independent A.15.1 admission, A.15.6 when composite, and F.6 only for current precise assignment-bound attribution.

Each declared relation-family coverage constraint is one FrameworkOrganizationCandidateClaimNode with claimNodeKind=constraint. Its coveredRelationFamilyRefKindPairs[1..*] identifies each covered relation-family value together with its exact kind; admittedFrameworkUseDescriptionRef names the use for which that coverage matters; and coverageCriterionDescriptionRef states how satisfaction of this coverage constraint is judged. A current A.15.2 WorkPlan acceptance target remains a different position: cite it through designBasisRefs[] or its direct acceptance-target relation. It neither replaces the coverage criterion nor shares one union field with it.