F.11:1 - Intent & applicability

Intent. Give a cold reader four practical questions that prevent common category errors:

1. What U.Method, the way of doing, is meant?
2. What U.MethodDescription, the episteme whose one exact EntityOfConcern is that Method, is being used?
3. What dated U.Work actually occurred?
4. Did that Work produce a control signal, command, setpoint, transformation output, or other domain-specific output that matters to this claim?

These questions are a reading aid, not a universal four-kind ontology. The fourth answer is whatever value and relation its direct control or transformation pattern defines; F.11 does not mint a universal U.Actuation kind.

Use this when. A sentence risks mixing a way of doing with its specification, a design with an occurrence, an approved description with evidence of results, or a Work occurrence with one of its outputs.

Do not use this when. The statement already names one exact value and direct relation unambiguously. F.11 does not prescribe files, tools, workflows, or a generic fact-transfer relation.