| Does the assignment obtain? | A.2.1 | The declared species and predicate, the occurrence’s participant values, and the occurrence-identity rule precede attribution but do not establish it. |
| Does the holder count under its system-role kind? | A.2, C.3.2 | Classification is not supplied by attribution. |
| Does the assignment satisfy a state predicate? | A.2.5 | State has its own predicate, relation, window, assertion, and evidence. |
| Can the holder perform the Work? | A.2.2 capability and fit | Ability is not actual performance. |
| Which Systems actually performed a top-level or child Work occurrence? | Recover each exact performer through A.13, then let A.15.1 independently admit that Work occurrence; add one F.6 check per exact performer–assignment pair only when the receiving question also asks under which assignment the Work was performed. | A team lead, coordinator, member relation, or covering assignment cannot substitute for the full actual-performer set. Every child Work keeps its own A.13 performer basis, A.15.1 admission, and Work-part relation; assignment and F.6 are added only for an expressly consumed attribution. Missing or failed F.6 leaves the child Work intact. |
| Did a passive test article participate in Work? | the domain rule that defines passive participation; if no such rule is current, A.6.RCD returns missing-governor | Holding a test-subject assignment does not make the article a performer or establish passive participation. |
| Which Method did the Work enact? | A.15.1, A.3.1, and A.3.2 only for a separate description-membership question | Method, description, and assignment do not become performers. |
| What supports the attribution assertion? | A.10 or the direct evidence relation | Support concerns knowledge or use, not relation obtaining. |
| Which encountered material is relied upon? | A.15.4 | Reliance on a visible item is not attribution. |
| What changed, first existed, was measured, evaluated, delivered, or accepted? | A.6.1 only when the claim consumes one exact operation application or returned-value binding; A.15.PROD plus the subject’s identity rule for a produced entity or its inception; C.2.1 for a result episteme; otherwise the exact change, measurement, evaluation, delivery, or acceptance pattern | Each claim follows its own pattern, and none supplies a performer-attribution participant. An operation binding alone establishes neither production nor a result episteme. |
| Does another context have a corresponding kind or assignment? | C.3.3, F.9, A.6.9 | A Bridge merges neither kind nor assignment and does not retarget Work. |
| Does a selected model-use structure change this attribution interpretation? | A.1.1 plus the receiving assertion or use | Generic assignment and attribution gain no optional structure participant. |