Library / First Principles Framework (FPF) - Core Conceptual Specification
Jump to passage
In this reading

Link to current text

Published source confirmed at last check

Source changed 2026-10-03 11:52:20 UTC · snapshot created 2026-10-03 11:53:41 UTC · last check 2026-10-03 14:35:13 UTC

F.9.1:5.5 - nonEquivalent is a warning, not a verdict generator

An affirmative bounded-use claim says that the Bridge is suitable for placing two senses in the same comparison table but not suitable for substitution. A nonEquivalent stance may make that limit easy to see. The label does not authorize a table or show that one was produced; nor does it make the Bridge Disjoint, set CL=0, negate another use, or prohibit a future use with different direction, rule, and tolerance.