fpf.tools
Library / First Principles Framework (FPF) - Core Conceptual Specification
Jump to passage
In this reading
Source · lines 114109–114119

Link to current text

Published source confirmed at last check

Source changed 2026-10-03 08:25:59 UTC · snapshot created 2026-10-03 08:26:43 UTC · last check 2026-10-03 09:30:10 UTC

G.1:2 - Problem

Without a chassis, CG‑Frame authoring tends to fail in repeatable ways:

  • SoTA is not locally scoped: inputs are “in the air”, not a reconstructible set.
  • Generation is ad‑hoc: variant candidates are emitted without a stable trace of why/when/how.
  • Selection is opaque: eligibility/acceptance and assurance are not pinned to explicit surfaces.
  • Outputs don’t land in reusable surfaces: no clean hand‑off into UTS / RoleDescription / Concept‑Sets / RSCR.
  • No kit‑level snapshot: the scaffold lacks a versioned manifest, so downstream can’t reliably cite “which chassis edition” was used.
  • Refresh is unplanned: there is no canonical wiring from edits/telemetry/decay to RSCR causes along the P2W path.