Library / First Principles Framework (FPF) - Core Conceptual Specification
Jump to passage
In this reading

Link to current text

Published source confirmed at last check

Source changed 2026-10-03 08:25:59 UTC · snapshot created 2026-10-03 08:26:43 UTC · last check 2026-10-03 09:10:20 UTC

G.1:3 - Forces

  • Breadth vs. precision: harvest wide enough to avoid local dogma, but keep the artefact actionable.
  • Generativity vs. assurance: encourage novelty while keeping evidence, legality, and trust inspectable.
  • Local meaning vs. portability: keep meaning local by default; crossing must be explicit and auditable.
  • Expressiveness vs. parsimony: resist inventing new types/slots; prefer reuse and explicit wiring.
  • Stability vs. evolution: keep stable IDs and pins while allowing SoTA, policies, and editions to evolve.
  • Didactic clarity vs. normative minimalism: authors need a concrete scaffold, but universal invariants must not be duplicated outside G.Core.