Source changed 2026-10-03 05:29:54 UTC · snapshot created 2026-10-03 05:30:57 UTC · last check 2026-10-03 05:35:10 UTC
HCD.11:8 - Common Anti-Patterns and How to Avoid Them
Anti-pattern
Better move
“The submitted answer is good, therefore the person can do the work.”
Inspect the person’s contribution where the producer or means could change the inference.
“The corrected answer counts as independent success.”
Retain the cue and test the contribution in a fresh uncued attempt.
“The total score passes despite the compatibility error.”
Keep the non-compensable criterion decisive and preserve the correct calculation separately.
“Removing every tool reveals real capability.”
Assess the required equipped contribution; specify an independent core only when the work needs it.
“One success proves the whole capability.”
State the tested envelope and finish the use it supports. Keep consequential untested variants outside the claim; obtain their evidence only for a selected stronger use when the observation is feasible and worthwhile. Missing evidence still withholds that stronger reliance.