HCD.20:4.4 - Allocate the actions and assistance before counting savings

For each candidate, show which actions remain personal, which benefit from exchange, which produce a common result, and which require qualified provider judgement. HCD.22 develops the shared task. Other participants may identify an ambiguity or challenge an inference; they do not acquire the authority or competence of a subject assessor by receiving the role title.

Choose when others’ solutions become visible and whether earlier personal work remains available. These are different decisions from membership. A private first attempt can preserve an initial judgement where that judgement matters. A demonstration can legitimately precede practice where the learner does not yet have a usable method. Do not impose unsupported independent search as a ritual.

Use HCD.7 for the actual support contributions. Distinguish subject help, facilitation, material preparation, technical assistance and assessment. One person can provide several contributions if qualified and available; the overlapping workload still counts. Use HCD.8 for a particular missing contribution.

AI may supply a contrast, draft feedback or suggest a tutor move when its result can be qualified and used. Count preparation, choice, checking, correction and fallback. If learning to judge is part of the target, a generated judgement does not perform the learner’s operation. If AI supports an experienced mentor, retain the mentor’s subject competence and ability to reject an unsuitable suggestion.