HCD.24:7 - Conformance Checklist

• Reviewer and author learning contributions are named separately.
• The criterion is understandable and supported for the actual work.
• Compared parts retain the context that makes the comparison meaningful.
• The reviewer supplies a judgement and grounds under declared assistance.
• The author uses or rejects the feedback with a reason and performs needed revision.
• Consequential disagreement has a competent return with real capacity.
• Feedback quality, product quality and personal learning claims remain distinguishable.