Library / Human Capability Development Principles Framework
Jump to passage
In this reading

Link to current text

Published source confirmed at last check

Source changed 2026-10-03 11:52:20 UTC · snapshot created 2026-10-03 11:53:41 UTC · last check 2026-10-03 13:25:20 UTC

HCD.2:3 - Forces

  • Complete tasks expose coordination and critical errors, while some prerequisites need preparation before meaningful whole-task practice.
  • Internalized performance can reduce access delay, while reliable references, tools, AI, and specialists can be legitimate parts of later Work.
  • A detailed programme is easier to inspect, while unequal detail is not evidence that it contributes more.
  • Personalization can remove redundant work, while role labels and audience averages do not establish one person’s starting capability.
  • A finite time budget forces displacement, while hidden reading, preparation, provider Work, and retries are easy to leave outside the count.
  • Early supported performance can enable practice, while it does not establish later independent, changed-condition, or delayed performance.
  • One candidate may be the only feasible option now, while feasibility alone does not establish dominance, effectiveness, or a final choice.
  • Programme design can reveal missing access or provider capability, while the description does not make that support available.
  • Future options can be valuable, while speculative option value must not replace the required near-term work result.