HCD.2:4.1 - Bind the Personal Comparison

Name:

1. the exact human holder and the basis for their participation;
2. the receiving decision, decision owner, later-Work family, configuration, horizon, and protected result or critical-error conditions;
3. a compatible HCD.1 demand account or equivalent qualified later-Work input;
4. the current performance evidence, supported contributions, unresolved gaps, and any HCD.3 target or HCD.4 profile that the comparison actually uses;
5. the professional Methods, target-domain criteria, source access, tools, AI posture, specialists, provider contributions, environment, authority, and time that are available or still assumed; and
6. the development stake that the candidates must address without silently changing it.

HCD.1, HCD.3, and HCD.4 can supply these inputs, but their PatternIDs are not ritual prerequisites. Compatible direct evidence is enough for the positions the current comparison consumes. Use diagnosis only when rival causes would change the programme.

If personal evidence, participation, later Work, or support conditions are missing, stop the personal comparison at the affected claim. For an unknown audience, issue the learning-product design return to HCD.28. When a product variant comes back for a named person, test its entry assumptions, intended contribution, assistance and burden against that person’s compatible evidence before using it as a programme candidate. For a missing target-domain Method or correctness criterion, return the exact qualified outside-owner question. If no candidate can make the supplied development stake feasible, return that constraint and the surviving alternatives to the separate navigation or target decision rather than weakening the stake inside HCD.2.