Library / Human Capability Development Principles Framework
Jump to passage
In this reading

Link to current text

Published source confirmed at last check

Source changed 2026-10-03 02:22:15 UTC · snapshot created 2026-10-03 03:38:22 UTC · last check 2026-10-03 04:40:20 UTC

HCD.6:3 - Forces

  • Whole tasks expose coordination and applicability, while irrelevant complexity can make the target action uninterpretable.
  • Worked explanations can reveal reasoning, while answer-bearing cues can conceal recognition and selection.
  • Legitimate references, AI, tools, and specialists belong to later Work, while their contributions must not be attributed to the person.
  • Familiar cases lower entry burden, while meaningful transfer requires changes that affect the decision rather than only the story.
  • Stable conditions help isolate one action, while varied conditions reveal whether the Method is selected and adapted.
  • A correct refusal protects against unsupported action, while habitual caution is wrong when the supplied evidence supports continuation.
  • Immediate correction supports another attempt, while feedback can teach, prime, fatigue, or otherwise contaminate later evidence.
  • Target-domain realism improves relevance, while professional correctness and hazards must come from qualified domain sources or explicitly stipulated teaching data.
  • A fixed challenge level is easy to schedule, while prior knowledge, task complexity, and support determine usable difficulty.