| HCD.1 demand account and evidence needs | HCD.3 | Same-holder evidence input only when it can change the diagnosis under compatible configuration, conditions, horizon, evidence window, and receiving decision. It entails no target. |
| HCD.1 demand account and evidence needs | HCD.4 | Same-holder scope/result frame only. It creates no temporal order, current mastery, or choice. |
| HCD.1 demand account, HCD.3 target, and HCD.4 profile values | HCD.2 | Same-holder later-Work, fit, starting-evidence, protected-strength and priority inputs, or qualified equivalents. They neither compose the candidates nor choose one. |
| HCD.3 target and HCD.4 priorities | HCD.5 | Target, rival, starting-attempt, protected-condition and fit inputs. They do not select the development Method by themselves. |
| HCD.5 Method proposal, HCD.6 task design, HCD.7 support account, and HCD.8 contribution plan when needed | HCD.2 | Prepare the smallest comparable programme fragment before choice. Retain actual availability separately from assumptions; preparation supplies comparison inputs without committing to the programme. |
| HCD.2 programme comparison | Authorized chooser; HCD.5–HCD.8 for elaborating a chosen programme | The comparison informs a separate choice. After that choice, complete or revise the selected programme’s Methods, tasks and support. Comparison alone establishes no commitment, launch or effect. |
| HCD.5 selected Method and evidence plan | HCD.6, HCD.7 and HCD.9 | Proposed mechanism, target action, task, support and observation requirements. Selection is not evidence that the Method works. |
| HCD.6.1 contrast and learner response | HCD.6 whole task; HCD.9 correction and HCD.10 next-episode design | Make a required difference accessible and choose the next action from what the learner noticed. Preserve supplied help and the separate execution capability; one successful response does not establish learning or transfer. |
| EXD.1, EXD.2 or EXD.5 | HCD.6 task design or HCD.9 practice, when explanation is the selected contribution | A qualified question, discriminating example or guided learner explanation, with the subject grounds and assistance conditions retained. HCD keeps the practice, progression and learning-evidence questions. |
| HCD.6 representative task and HCD.7 enabled support, with HCD.8 only when an exact contribution had to be obtained or built | HCD.9 | Practice object, criteria, permitted support, actual access and operating contribution. A design, booking or completed provider course is not a performed learner attempt. |
| HCD.9 focused-practice episode and attempt history | HCD.10 and HCD.11 | Evidence for the next practice-condition decision or for bounded performance assessment. Correction after feedback remains distinct from an independent attempt. |
| HCD.10 condition-sensitive progression | HCD.9, HCD.11 and later evidence uses | Next episode conditions and response rules only. Spacing, retrieval, transfer, retention and effectiveness do not follow from dates or design labels. |
| HCD.1 or equivalent demand frame | HCD.11 | Same-holder contribution, conditions and receiving-use input; it is not current performance evidence. |
| HCD.11 or equivalent qualified performance | HCD.12 and HCD.13 | Prior contribution and conditions for the specified unfamiliarity, delay or support comparison. No transfer or retention result follows automatically. |
| New-source learning question, source and task criteria | HCD.12:4.5 | Prior preparation, familiarity and access conditions support this separate entry. Prior execution of the new Method is not required; report the observed application without inventing an earlier transfer basis. |
| Any compatible HCD.11, HCD.12 or HCD.13 observation | HCD.14 | Evidence that changes an identified development assumption; all three assessments are not required. |
| New compatible contribution evidence | HCD.3, HCD.4, HCD.2 or HCD.5 | Reopen only the affected diagnosis, profile, programme comparison or Method selection; preserve unchanged claims and candidates. |
| HCD.14 revision hypothesis and test | Responsible practitioner or Learning Product owner | A proposed local arrangement change; authority, performed work and observed outcome remain separate. |
| HCD.14 bounded revision hypothesis and affected evidence | HCD.15 | Compatible decision input for the same holder, later Work, affected claim, conditions and evidence window; it establishes no continuing trigger, provider operation or authorization. |
| HCD.15 observed arrangement use and human-development evidence | HCD.16 | Evidence input only; a designed arrangement, attendance record or community membership is not Method fit, transfer, retention or worth. |
| HCD.14 revision hypothesis | HCD.17 | Proposed cultural variation or affected condition only; it proves no cultural relation or intervention authority. |
| HCD.16 bounded repertoire disposition and variation account | HCD.17 | Status-preserved cultural-variation input only; it proves neither actual enactment nor authority. |
| HCD.18 specification or a qualified equivalent | HCD.19 | Evaluation input only when material, audience, task denominator, support, scale meanings and evidence conditions fit; construction is not a prerequisite when compatibility already holds. |
| HCD.19 material diagnosis and affected-use test | E.23; the responsible material or support owner | Limiting defect, repair reach, protected contributions and discriminating repeat; a material change is not a human learning result. |
| HCD.19 actual reader observations | HCD.11, HCD.12 or HCD.13 only when their question is live | Evidence contribution subject to the receiving human claim, first/helped conditions and evidence window; no automatic capability, transfer or retention conclusion. |
| NSTD.6 and NSTD.8 narrative contribution | HCD.18/.19 when selected | Current product/source/history distinction, attachment and available-prefix method; no narrative prerequisite for a nonnarrative material. |
| HCD.2 unknown-audience design return | HCD.28 | Existing outputs, audience assumptions, variants, resources and individualization questions permit product construction without inventing a personal profile. |
| HCD.28 product variants and requirements | HCD.2 | Candidate input for a known person’s comparison only when their own work, starting evidence, participation and actual support are added. |
| HCD.28 or equivalent learning target and supply constraints | HCD.20; HCD.22 when a shared task is needed | Compare the arrangement and construct the needed interaction; a sufficient individual product remains possible. |
| HCD.20 comparison and HCD.22 shared task | HCD.28, HCD.7/.8 and applicable HCD.9–13 uses | Actual actions, transfers and burdens constrain the whole product; design and common-result quality supply no automatic personal learning inference. |
| HCD.28 distinct gap diagnosis | Subject-method owner; HCD.19; HCD.7/.8 and direct service owners | Obtain the missing subject criterion, repair its teaching, or restore supply according to the affected contribution. |
| HCD.20 task-derived composition constraints | HCD.21 | Select and connect compatible participants; actual contact remains distinct from assignment. |
| HCD.22 learning task and qualified criteria | HCD.23, HCD.24 or HCD.25 as needed | Develop the selected explanation, judgement/revision or cross-project relation and return its personal action and support conditions. |
| HCD.21 contact and HCD.22–25 actual work | HCD.26 and HCD.27 | Regulate a present attempt or restore compatible material and timing connections without erasing missing personal contributions. |
| HCD.21–27 arrangement conditions and observations | HCD.28; HCD.7/.8; affected HCD.9–14 uses | Return actual preparation, help, burden and limits; reopen only the product, supply or personal conclusion those values change. |