HRM.1:4.4 - Examine the dependencies that can defeat an option
Use the relevant HR Method to substantiate each unresolved professional result. Then follow its consequences:
| Dependency | Test and useful correction |
|---|---|
| Work → assessment | Does the selection evidence concern the actual job and permitted support? Revise the evidence or the proposed job. |
| Opportunity → capability evidence | Can candidates obtain a fair opportunity to demonstrate the required contribution? Distinguish absent evidence, absent capability and absent access. |
| Work → job value and reward | Do changed responsibilities alter the valuation or reward grounds? Separate a job change from individual performance. |
| Reward → requested contribution | Do targets, paid time and progression support the helping or cooperative work being promised? Change the target, provision or promise when they conflict. |
| Protection → work and terms | Can the proposed hours, coverage and assignments meet the qualified conditions? Return an impossible arrangement to OCE/OPS and the terms owner. |
| Voice → premises and decisions | Can participants supply information and use the required influence or challenge route before the relevant decision becomes irreversible? |
| Personnel data → further use | Is the new use justified and permitted? A shared database does not authorize use of private development or health material for selection. |
Resolve a defect at its actual owner. Invalid selection evidence needs assessment work; an unsupported service promise needs an operating decision; an uncertain health premise needs the qualified supplier. Negotiation can settle discretionary terms. It cannot manufacture a missing clinical conclusion or waive a binding protection merely by obtaining agreement.