LDR.Use:2 - Advice changes the promise

Using LDR.4, the organizer asks community representatives whose judgement they need before accepting the offer. One wants advice from a practitioner who helped with an earlier clinic. A permitted anonymized example lets that adviser expose a misleading promise: the service can diagnose the missing ground but cannot promise to complete an unknown amount of corrective engineering within the session.

The domain team and intended clients trace one representative case. They distinguish the service’s diagnosis and bounded acceptance decision from the client’s later correction work. Through B.5.SD they construct a clearer account: the receiver will get the warranted finding, its grounds, a feasible next question or correction, and the limitation on further reliance. A case with no attainable correction may properly end in deferral.

The revised promise changes both expectations and resources. The client must accept responsibility for obtaining corrective work, or the provider must quote and supply it separately. The communities do not solve this by improving the advertising language alone; they revise the offered work and the terms clients can accept.