MDPE.14:5 - Recognition and Assurance

Recognize a complete first result when the practitioner can answer:

1. Which Music-or-Dance results conflict in the bounded situation?
2. Which conflict branch applies, and what relation supports it?
3. If the conflict crosses declared scopes, which residual and candidate-frame work is reused from C.30.ILC and C.32.MLAO? Otherwise, which named participants, structures and local conflict guide the response?
4. Which Music-or-Dance relations, candidate families, criteria, vetoes, and trials change the decision?
5. What comparison and choice were made, or which observation is still needed?
6. When change Work is selected, which capable Agent will perform it and which direct Method will it enact? For every result, what would reopen the decision?

Assure the result by checking that:

• cross-scale is used only with a stated scale order;
• part–whole, Work overlap, slower constraint, representation use, and Method unfolding remain different;
• actual and possible-future Work are not mixed;
• observed difference, association, design hypothesis, and causal contribution are not collapsed;
• local and protected results both have evidence or explicit uncertainty;
• safety, consent, authority, permission, access, attribution, and equipment limits are not traded away by a score;
• alternatives differ by changed relation or failure mode;
• moved burden and lost alternatives are visible;
• the deciding Agent is not confused with the performing Agent or wider performing whole;
• results from direct comparison, choice, enactment, observation, and causal Methods remain separate; and
• a local decision is not reported as cultural selection, retention, progress, or a new whole.