Library / Music and Dance Practice Engineering Principles Framework
Jump to passage
In this reading

Link to current text

Published source confirmed at last check

Source changed 2026-10-03 11:52:20 UTC · snapshot created 2026-10-03 11:53:41 UTC · last check 2026-10-03 12:50:07 UTC

MDPE.19:0.1 - Working Distinctions

Name the world-side subject before using continuation language. A variant in this pattern can be, for example, a performance Method, musical or movement material, a teaching Method, a performance configuration, an event form, or a recognition arrangement. These subjects can continue or fail independently.

Keep five distinctions visible:

DistinctionPractical consequence
Record versus practiceA score, video, model, tutorial, or archive entry can support reconstruction; reproducing the practice requires Music-or-Dance Work.
Occurrence versus reproducibilityOne performance shows that one performance occurred. Continuation requires another representative occurrence or credible capacity to produce one when needed.
Performer versus performing wholeA performing Agent performs Work, and that Work enacts a Method. The wider performing whole can also require a body, partner, instrument, software, venue equipment, or other supporting Systems.
Support versus fragilityIntended support is not a defect. It becomes a continuation risk when the receiving use requires replacement, variation, or operation after that support changes.
Local retirement versus cultural lossA school can stop a class and an ensemble can remove a work from its repertoire. Neither decision establishes that a wider practice has disappeared.

Here Agent means a System with enough agency for the deciding or performing contribution in the case. Use System for an instrument, venue, platform, archive, software component, or other participant when agency is not established or is irrelevant.