MDPE.5:6 - Sources and Epistemic Boundaries
| Source or maintained result | Contribution used here | Boundary |
|---|---|---|
| Holly Herndon and Mat Dryhurst, The Call, Serpentine | Human–AI choral production joining material, choirs, recording protocol, dataset, models, and exhibition. | No universal production Method, comparative cost, recognized new style, or durable continuation follows. |
| Kloosterman and van Kempen, NDT production case, Tell Your Mom You Love Your Skin | Obtaining Dance-production case with choreographic, costume, technical, venue, rehearsal, film, archive, and touring relations. | One well-resourced production does not define all Dance production or establish artistic superiority. |
| Algorave guidelines | Direct community event-programming Method that returns an event programme and production brief covering setting, sound, visible process, programme diversity, affordability, access, conduct, and community contact. | The result does not supply a performer Method, local technical rehearsal, performed Music Work, audience recognition, or later cultural continuation. |
| Shimon project | Bounded robot performance separated from human production and later practice development. | Concert presentation does not establish robot-held authority, a style, or cultural continuation. |
| Yamaha, Seven Ways to Ensure a Smooth Sound Check (2022) | Current practitioner guidance for an input list, stage plot, performer–engineer communication, console scene, monitor and house mix, room listening, and show checklist. | A successful soundcheck does not identify or preserve every artistic relation or establish the performed Music Work and its receiving use. |
| World Swing Dance Council, Social Etiquette for Swing Dancers, and Country Dance and Song Society, Community Culture and Safety Toolkit, especially Part 5 (2024) | Maintained social Dance, Music, and song-event guidance for venue access, floor, acoustics, sound, capacity, staffing, equipment safety, responsibilities, and contingencies. | These checks prepare a containing event; they do not establish one pair’s performed Dance Work, partner-readable timing, artistic value, or whole-community safety. |
| Los Angeles Department on Disability, Accessible Public Meetings and Events Toolkit | Current direct guidance for performer and audience accommodations, captions, transcripts, audio description, accessible media, technical tests, and later correction of recorded or streamed material. | Accessibility provisions do not by themselves establish that the intended musical, movement, or participatory relation survived, nor that recipients recognized or valued it. |
FPF A.15.1, A.15.7, A.22, E.24.PUB | Work grounding, bounded live steering, several architecture views, and publication distinctions. | These results supply no Music or Dance production choice. |
| Systems Engineering, Operations Management, and direct production Methods | Configurations, services, operating results, specialist evidence, and direct Work. | Local success does not establish artistic or participatory fit; MDPE.5 does not absorb these Methods. |
These current practices supply different specialist results. The table shows which Music-or-Dance integration question can remain after those results are available:
| Current direct practice | Result already supplied | Remaining integration failure | MDPE.5 move that remains | Stronger claim not made |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Live Music soundcheck and Algorave event programming | Input list, stage plot, checked signal and monitor conditions, plus a programme and production brief | These results do not show that a selected performer’s Work preserves the intended sound, visible-process, or audience relation in the assembled conditions. | MDPE.5:2.3–2.5 selects and probes that relation, then records the performed Work and receiving use separately. | No universal live-production Method, prevalence, effectiveness, or cultural uptake. |
| WSDC social-floor guidance and CDSS Dance-event preparation | Slot orientation, adaptation, partner attention, refusal and stopping, plus venue, floor, access, sound, capacity, staffing, equipment, and contingency questions | These results do not show that pair Work remains readable, participatory, and safe at the intended density. | MDPE.5:2.4 tests the load-bearing floor–sound–pair relation in representative conditions. | No whole-field event recipe or population-wide safety claim. |
| Accessible live, recorded, and online event provision | Selected accommodations, media forms, technical checks, captions, transcripts, or audio description | Provision of access does not identify which musical, movement, or participation relation the receiving use needs or whether it survived the chosen medium. | MDPE.5:2.1 names that use and MDPE.5:2.5 states what actually became available without turning access into recognition. | No universal accessibility solution, artistic-value claim, or evidence of later use. |
| NDT guest-choreographer Dance production | A premiered work and production arrangement with specialist costume, set, light, sound, stage, touring, film, and archive results | Specialist completion can still change what dancers can enact and what an audience can encounter. | MDPE.5:2.2–2.4 compares those results against the intended Dance use at their load-bearing relations. | No universal Dance-production Method or proof of artistic superiority. |
Across these forms, test relations where otherwise valid specialist results change the Music-or-Dance Work or its intended use. Use a direct Method when it already returns the complete result.
Reconsider how to integrate the results if a direct field Method offers the same result with less burden, or a representative Music-or-Dance case defeats a relied-on integration assumption.