MDPE.7:5.3 - Movement-generation project: return to practitioner comparison, not platform release

The Chédin et al. case supports high- and low-fidelity movement-generation outputs having different practitioner uses, while a middling compromise was rejected in that setting. A maintained alternative account can record the branches, their proposed uses, and the evidence about availability.

Before choosing another dancer-involving comparison, a model or interface repair, or maintenance Work for the low-fidelity stimulus branch, establish that the relevant branch is available for the named practitioner use: its output or bearer can be obtained; a capable and permitted Agent can use it; and the required model, interface, configuration, access, and upkeep relations obtain. If only the account survives, choose reconstruction or upkeep Work, or let C.11 return reject current set; stopping is not disguised as another development-Work option.

The project team or other named DecisionSubject makes the next decision only under an independently supported authority relation. Release, cultural recognition, and transmission need separate results. A new model score that cannot change the performer-facing decision is not a reason to postpone the choice.