ME.10:11 - SoTA-Echoing
| Source | Adopted or adapted contribution | Boundary and practitioner implication |
|---|---|---|
| Daalhuizen and Cash, Method content theory; Gericke, Eckert, and Stacey, Elements of a design method | Adopt user-relevant content, representation, tools, adaptation conditions, and intended-use questions. | These inputs help construct task rows; they do not establish task Work, configuration adequacy, or one selected arrangement. |
| Gericke et al., method ecosystems | Adapt attention to interacting Methods, actors, tools, representations, and organizational conditions. | The position paper identifies no universal platform or selected structure. Practitioners keep Systems, relations, task criteria, and evidence status explicit. |
| Stacey et al., Methods as engineering knowledge | Adopt maintained knowledge, provenance, retrieval, and use as engineering concerns. | Knowledge maintenance, publication, and availability do not establish actual user Work, task coverage, fit, or effectiveness. |
| Inkermann, AI-supported design-Method use | Adopt explicit AI contribution, criteria, provider-to-output traceability, transparency, responsibility, and feedback questions. | The framework is exploratory. It supplies no autonomous authority, effectiveness, or general configuration-selection claim; EC-417 keeps provider use and feedback untested. |
Current FPF C.37 | Reuse the receiver/action boundary, direct-result and reliance layers, exposure and loss, disposition, direct exit, return and use-needed retention. | An immediate complete selection requires no new record. When later use needs the basis, ME.10 retains it once in an owning task row or consumes the complete ME.9 profile. These results establish no support-configuration choice, Method status, access, capability, authority, Work or task pass. |
Current FPF A.15.8 | Reuse its actual-Work versus present-WorkPlan branches, separately identified performers and supports, weakest decision-changing probe, continuation or recovery observation, and direct-relation repair. | ME.10 supplies Method-material task rows and domain-specific inputs. It uses a cheap direct task test when recovery configuration is not the live question. |
Current FPF A.19.CPM and A.19.SelectorMechanism | Reuse explicit criteria, evidence-gated comparison, incomparability, abstention, and set-valued selection for non-trivial configuration choices. | ME.10 supplies the configuration candidates and Method-material criteria; it does not redefine comparison or selection, hide scalarization, or force a singleton. |
Current FPF A.22, A.2.2, A.2.8.PER, A.6.REL, A.6.1, A.13, A.15.1, C.2.1, C.13, and E.24.PUB | Reuse structure selection, capability, permission, direct-relation, operation-application, performer and Work-admission, episteme, collection-account, and publication boundaries. | ME.10 retains only its Method Base, named-use configuration, task-set, and result-routing specialization. |
| Method Engineering synthesis in ME.10 | Combine named Method-material uses into a bounded task set, choose the cheap or governed comparison and recovery branch, preserve evidence status, and return the supported configuration, retained set, split, or gap to its direct owner. | This is an expert synthesis for Method-material tasks, not a replacement for C.37, A.15.8, or A.19 and not proof of general effectiveness. Return missing-task-set, missing-configuration-basis, missing-task-test, or unresolved-configuration-choice[...] when the move cannot justify a stronger result. |
Reopen when a mandatory action cannot be represented without a different use boundary; a complete C.37 group no longer fits its owning task or ME.9 action row; needed information about ME.9’s cross-use correspondences, material omissions, edition relations, decisions to keep representations separate, or conditions for reconsidering several selections is missing or no longer supported; an unlike task defeats the residual specialization; current C.37, A.15.8, or A.19 changes the consumed move; actual provider or feedback Work changes a gap; a selection-use basis establishes the proposed A.22 structure; or a collection, edition, or reliance problem gains an independent practitioner use and stop that may justify a separate pattern.