ME.11:11 - SoTA-Echoing
| Source | Adopted or adapted contribution | Boundary and practitioner implication |
|---|---|---|
| Yildirim, Campean, and Uddin, function-modeling evaluation in industry practice | Adopt workplace projects, varied application situations, reported limitations, later report analysis, and separation of direct and indirect contribution as trial-design and evidence-recording cues. | One automotive OEM, SSFD used within a broader methodology, and retrospective reports establish neither SSFD-only causality nor universal transfer. |
| Tsai, Zdravkovic, and Söder, DBE-design Method action research | Adopt repeated plan-perform-evaluate cycles in an operating health-services ecosystem as an unlike-domain replay of actual validation actions. | The evaluation is ex ante and case-specific; it establishes neither long-term effect nor transfer to the other elicited domains. |
| Faludi, Yiu, and Agogino, empirical tests of sustainable-design Methods | Adopt explicit alternative Methods, several industry situations, participant Work, activities, and immediate value reports as a bounded comparison input. | Immediate self-report establishes neither long-term product results, causal superiority, nor the effectiveness of recombined variants. |
Current FPF A.3.1, A.15.1, A.2.2, and A.10 | Adopt independent Method admission, Work occurrence admission, capability qualification, and evidence-use relations. | ME.11 contributes the practitioner move for situation selection and occurrence-level trial evidence; it does not redefine those claims or make the downstream judgments. |
Reopen the pattern when practitioners cannot select a discriminating situation without a universal trial taxonomy, when actual Work cannot be distinguished from demonstrations or records, when the candidate branch repeatedly loses status, or when current field evidence supports a stronger trial-selection move without broadening the later judgments.